Primary sources are preferred where possible
Contemporary records show what institutions wrote, decided or recorded. They still require historical context.
How we work
Editorial standards
Our purpose is to present the strongest affirmative case that accurate evidence allows.
Academic sources come before political organisations
Major claims rely on archives, museums, universities, primary documents and established scholarship.
Every significant historical claim is cited
Readers can inspect the evidence behind dates, quotations and factual assertions.
Accuracy strengthens advocacy
Support for Zionism never requires a claim that can be disproved. Weak claims are corrected or omitted.
Modern politics is not rewritten as ancient history
Present-day borders and identities are not projected backwards without context.
Different events keep their distinct causes
European pogroms, Nazi genocide and events in Middle Eastern countries are not treated as identical.
Errors are corrected transparently
Corrections preserve a record of what changed and why.
Jewish history is stated clearly
Jewish origin, continuity, peoplehood, return and self-determination are documented without apology.
Our editorial position
This project affirms Zionism: the Jewish people’s right to national self-determination and restoration in their ancestral homeland, the Land of Israel.
It makes that case through documented history—Jewish origin in the land, enduring connection, recurring diaspora vulnerability, organised return, institution-building and restored sovereignty. We omit hostile political polemics and never substitute exaggeration for evidence.